The office building has undergone profound upheavals in recent years, with the background of needing to make it a place to strengthen attachment to the company and collaboration between teams. With this in mind, the office must offer spaces that promote discussion and creativity, while ensuring that they are viable economically: as employees no longer travel to the workplace every day, the private space on offer must be flexible and shared.
The only way to combine all these requirements is to put in place procedures and tools which the employee has full use of. In other words, the employee making the effort to travel to his workplace must benefit from an impeccable experience. So, employees must be able to book their workstation or a meeting room in 2 clicks, be notified of the arrival of a visitor by a push notification, be informed of and easily indicate their participation in a business event on the premises, etc.
The transformation of an asset into a smart building, a connected building, and service-based, therefore must include the implementation of an application-specific to the building. Several types of tools exist to achieve this changeover:
SaaS or on-premise software: what is the most suitable option for digitising a building?
If the real estate world has been slow to turn in the digital direction, a more global phenomenon is emerging aimed at making all the services offered in buildings more accessible (online). This is a consequence of the emergence of co-working and co-living. The range of services today is at the heart of the building attractiveness strategy, and is in line with the needs and wishes of the occupants.
The Smart Building, in which the user can complete their entire journey using their smartphone alone, is the favourite solution for real estate players and their occupants. The solution put in place must solve all the problems, within a single tool:
It is crucial that all the services are grouped together in a single platform. The service offer has flourished in recent years, but the support and service providers being numerous, it is often difficult for employees to know where to find information or how to order a particular service.
Thus, it is not uncommon to find within the same building:
In practice, the offer is inaccessible, due to a lack of overall visibility, being forced to download numerous applications, a multiplication of passwords etc., while it is also very expensive for the company. It is therefore essential to ensure that as many occupants as possible benefit from it.
When switching to Smart Building, several criteria must be taken into account in choosing a solution:
These essential elements can be addressed by the SaaS model as well as by the Agency model.
Choosing the “Agency” model means choosing a unique app, entirely designed around the specific needs of a particular Smart Building. In practice, this translates into the creation of an application from scratch, the costs of which are entirely borne by a single customer. The project, which spans several months, also requires a significant investment of time on the part of the internal teams in order to write the technical specifications and monitor the progress of the project.
When it is released, the application perfectly reflects the connected building services offer, as it exists on the day of deployment. It is in the long term that the on-premises solution may fail. The app being unique and ultra-specific, it does not benefit from networking interaction, and each graphic and functional update must be supported by the customer (financially but also in terms of project management). Technical maintenance also increases the overall bill.
In a changing environment, where new features are introduced each month, fixed solutions are unsuitable and particularly subject to the vagaries of business life, for example, budget cuts leading to an end of updates, change in the customer’s team causing a loss of expertise in handling the solution, and so on. The teams in charge of the project end up losing interest in it, and the application is just another unused tool that has been very expensive.
As well as the evolution of functionalities and the economic ups and downs of a company, technology is a field that is changing very quickly. The speed of obsolescence is accelerated by the GAFAMs, which have accustomed individuals to a pace of innovation that is difficult to follow.
The alternative to the on-premises model is to adopt the SaaS model with an off-the-shelf application, which is often not very customisable. Several customers then have the same tool – with different bodies – which makes it possible to pool costs. On average, a SaaS solution is thus 5 times cheaper than a solution developed by an agency.
In addition, the implementation of a SaaS solution can be carried out in a very short time, while requiring limited recourse to the customer’s teams, who only have to configure an already existing application. But above all, the SaaS model gives scalability and adaptation to the latest uses. This solution avoids the preparation of new development budgets each year. The price of the changes being structurally included in the subscription to the solution, is not likely to change.
However, the standard nature of such a solution constitutes a significant obstacle for many customers. More than a simple software solution, the Smart Building application is also the showcase of the building and / or the culture of the company, so it cannot be identical to that of other users.
The needs of occupants in their places of living and working are identical: communication, community and services… they want to have easy access to all of their building’s offers within a single application. However, each building is unique and each company wishes to be able to offer its own experience to differentiate its brand and to contribute to the creation of a united community.
This is why today’s Smart Building requires the flexibility of an off-the-shelf app but with a high level of customisation. By using this model, customers have a scalable tool while benefiting from the pooling of costs and offering their occupants a unique experience. Integration of dedicated service providers, but also offering colours, “Adaptable SaaS” is based on a cutting-edge platform while offering a high degree of customisation. The building becomes a brand. The customer thus benefits from an optimal solution and controls his financial and human costs thanks to an annual rental system with the freedom to terminate at no additional cost.
Hot desking versus coworking: what are the differences between these flexible work organization approaches?
In business, the role of the CHO (Chief Happiness Officer) is like a great toolbox. To the point of being able to be replaced by an all-in-one app?
There are more and more startup accelerators. How to attract start-ups and best manage this innovation space?